(re: re: re: So Ken, anymore news on this “meeting” with Sierra’s CEO in April?)
How many years have you been following, involved or studying the game industry? I’ve 24 years and counting, since 1980, and little here and there.
Your attitude and tone in the response in written in poor taste, towards opinions and hopes. And, apparently, you offer no proof towards your critisms, just blind praise of things that are, and from my “opinion”, no desire to actually change, like Conservatives on Talk Radio.
C’mon, work with everybody, and start giving solutions with the critisms, and start to offer encouragement with the rage. I can do the same as you, but I choose not to. Not worth my time. I raged at the current state of games, and expressed a hope that some industry giants would see past their own egos to create what I feel inside of Ken whenever this issue comes up.
Your letter is an anti-Nintendo, anti-Windows type of letter. Why? What have those concepts done to you personally? (Just curious.) I encourage you the next time you write something in response, keep attacks on opinions and hopes out of it.
By the way, PC games do suck compared to what I’ve played over the last 24 years. And to compare another concept/industry to the gaming industry is not very meaningful. Why do that? Apples and oranges. Don’t do that, fire at me with my stuff, no rhertorics. It don’t work.
Now, follow my response here carefully and understand I’ve critizing and giving you solutions to give a more powerful response to my opinions and hopes. The words you gave off, honestly, feel very powerless and seem just be an attack. Since I am a business owner, and also have worked in high management positions for over 40 years, I’ve seen these kind of responses before. Sorry, but whatever you were sharing with me isn’t there. The response isn’t from your heart, just your head.
Please, re-read what I wrote, and give me an excellent response backed up with proof of what your see and what your have experienced.