(re: re: re: LSL without Al???)
Ok let me reiterate what I posted. I didn’t feel like writing a huge thesis on here about what this game might be like. Ok, it’s most likely going to suck, BIG, and maybe it’ll be the thing that finally kills this beast of a Sierra. What I was trying to say was that who knows what this game is going to be like. Yeah, No Al=sure fire death to Larry, but an attempt is being made, albeit a poor excuse of one and Al should have been the one to do it. I agree Larry isn’t Larry without Al Lowe. Unfortunately, we don’t have him involved with the project. Although I feel that if we do a boycott before the game is even out, it’s more reason for Sierra to not do anything with any of the old franchises and we’ll never see them again. I’m not a huge PC gamer these days for obvious reasons. I only turn my machine on to play the old games that we all are on here to remember. There’s nothing out there worth playing in my eyes, and Sierra doesn’t seem to want to listen to what we have to say. Well they did with this new Larry but are doing it all wrong. My point being in my last post was that who knows what this is going to end up turning into. Hell the project might even get shelved like all the other attempts Sierra has made. We don’t have the old company to work with here and they’re not giving up the rights so who knows what will happen. As for my referencing of the Hobbit, I only mentioned it because it’s the first in house developed game that I’ve personally seen lately, that was all. It’s probably going to suck as well, but it did look nice, is all.